The Enduring Value of Watches: Casio, Smartwatches, and Traditional Timepieces

In the ever-evolving landscape of timekeeping, watches have transcended their primary function and become a reflection of personal style, technological innovation, and enduring craftsmanship. From the cutting-edge Casio watches to the sleek sophistication of smartwatches and the timeless allure of traditional timepieces, each category offers unique benefits and value propositions.

### Casio Watches: Affordable Functionality and Durability

Casio has long been synonymous with affordable and reliable watches, catering to a wide range of consumers. Their timepieces are renowned for their ruggedness, water resistance, and feature-rich designs, making them ideal for outdoor enthusiasts and those with an active lifestyle.

One of the standout features of Casio watches is their exceptional battery life, often lasting years on a single battery[1]. This low-maintenance aspect is a significant advantage over smartwatches, which require frequent charging. Additionally, Casio's commitment to innovation has led to the development of advanced features like solar power, atomic timekeeping, and various specialized functions tailored to specific activities.

While Casio watches may not command the same prestige as luxury brands, their value lies in their practicality, durability, and affordability. With a wide range of models available at accessible price points, Casio caters to consumers seeking functional and reliable timekeepers without breaking the bank.

### Smartwatches: Cutting-Edge Technology and Connectivity

Smartwatches have revolutionized the way we interact with technology, seamlessly integrating timekeeping with a plethora of advanced features. These wearable devices offer a level of connectivity and functionality that traditional watches simply cannot match.

From fitness tracking and health monitoring to receiving notifications and controlling smart home devices, smartwatches have become indispensable tools for the modern, tech-savvy individual[2]. Their sleek designs and customizable watch faces appeal to those seeking a blend of style and functionality.

However, smartwatches come with their own set of trade-offs. Their reliance on battery power and the need for regular software updates can be inconvenient[1]. Additionally, their value tends to depreciate rapidly as newer models with improved features are released, making them less appealing as long-term investments.

### Traditional Watches: Timeless Elegance and Craftsmanship

Traditional watches, particularly those from renowned luxury brands, represent the pinnacle of watchmaking craftsmanship and artistry. These timepieces are not merely functional accessories but rather works of art that have stood the test of time.

The intricate mechanical movements, exquisite designs, and meticulous attention to detail found in traditional watches are a testament to the skill and dedication of master watchmakers[3]. These timepieces often appreciate in value over time, becoming coveted collectibles and heirlooms passed down through generations.

While traditional watches may lack the technological advancements of smartwatches, their enduring appeal lies in their timeless elegance, superior craftsmanship, and the emotional connection they foster with their owners. These watches are investments in both style and heritage, transcending mere functionality to become symbols of luxury and prestige.

### Resale Value and Investment Potential

When it comes to resale value and investment potential, traditional luxury watches often hold the upper hand. Brands like Rolex, Patek Philippe, and Audemars Piguet have established themselves as icons in the watchmaking industry, with their timepieces commanding premium prices on the secondary market[3].

The scarcity, craftsmanship, and historical significance of these watches contribute to their appreciation in value over time. Collectors and enthusiasts are willing to pay top dollar for rare and well-maintained pieces, making traditional luxury watches a viable investment option for those with a discerning eye and deep pockets.

In contrast, smartwatches and affordable watch brands like Casio tend to depreciate rapidly as new models are released and technology advances. While they may offer excellent value for money initially, their resale value is often limited due to the constant cycle of innovation and obsolescence.

In the realm of watches, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Each category – Casio, smartwatches, and traditional timepieces – caters to different needs, preferences, and budgets. Casio watches offer affordability, durability, and practical functionality, making them ideal for those seeking reliable timekeepers without breaking the bank. Smartwatches, on the other hand, provide cutting-edge technology and connectivity, appealing to the tech-savvy and fitness-conscious individuals.

However, for those who appreciate timeless elegance, superior craftsmanship, and the potential for long-term investment, traditional luxury watches remain unparalleled. These timepieces transcend mere functionality, becoming symbols of style, heritage, and prestige.

Ultimately, the choice between these watch categories comes down to personal priorities, lifestyle, and budget. Whether you seek the ruggedness of a Casio, the cutting-edge features of a smartwatch, or the enduring allure of a traditional timepiece, the world of watches offers something for everyone, catering to diverse tastes and preferences.

https://www.asorockwatches.com/en-ca/blogs/how-to/smartwatch-vs-traditional-watches

https://wristaficionado.com/blogs/news/smartwatches-and-their-impact-on-traditional-timepieces-a-paradigm-shift-in-the-watch-industry

https://istarmax.com/blog/classic-watch-vs-smartwatch-which-is-more-valuable-and-profitable/

https://davosa-usa.com/blogs/story-time/smartwatch-vs-regular-watch

https://www.mypacertimes.com/home/2024/4/7/why-i-wear-an-analog-watchimepiece

 https://www.asorockwatches.com/en-ca/blogs/how-to/smartwatch-vs-traditional-watches

https://wristaficionado.com/blogs/news/smartwatches-and-their-impact-on-traditional-timepieces-a-paradigm-shift-in-the-watch-industry

 https://istarmax.com/blog/classic-watch-vs-smartwatch-which-is-more-valuable-and-profitable/

 https://davosa-usa.com/blogs/story-time/smartwatch-vs-regular-watch/

 https://www.mypacertimes.com/home/2024/4/7/why-i-wear-an-analog-watch/

Fuck sake.

 Where are the heroes?  It's over people, pack it the fuck up, the drones have come in their crocks with their mumble rap, drinking gatorade for electrolytes and they don't care who they hurt as long as they can bate-to-some ass in one of those wall-e chairs, undisturbed.  Its armageddon.  The run on the banks is coming and I for one am here for the fucking show folks, I can't wait to start putting gatorade on the plants and watching the dustbowl grow as we all worship the mighty Cosco and feed our fat fucking faces.  That's probably the bright side.  I am down to see the fucking clowns in the upcoming purge as bread and circus's turn to guillotines and the burning of the rich.  It's going to be a fucking show folks, mark my words --and the revolution will not be televised, bring you lawn chair and get you a liter of cola or a Big Gulp.  

You would think at this point that people would have their facts together and generally understand the world and what we are doing here, but they seem more confused than ever.  They are trying to go back to fucking farming for fuck sake.  Like we are so close to fucking hoverboards and jetpacks and you fucking people are ruining it, not happy.  

I have donated nearly no time to writing and certainly none to doing it accurately or consistently.  While I sometimes enjoy writing and communicating things, normally I am doing it cathartically and not to really inform the reader.  I am sure if I put my mind to it or otherwise worked in an organized way, having some process, I may even be good at it at some point, but based on this introduction, perhaps not. 

I am not sure my goal here is accuracy and proper formation of ideas, were you not reading, were're fucked --perhaps only so much that the text is discernible as English and conveys some point, if convoluted.  The first problem with this: I'm a horrible speller and generally don't give a shit if you can follow the train of thought, not my job.  Secondly, I don't reread most of what I write --hence this pile of unlettered horeshit.  Mostly, this is stream of consciousness type stuff, I like to get thoughts out and worry about making a point later or at least focus on only those points that are important and let you sort out the rest for yourselves and identify any available meaning --writers don't seem to like this approach. Fourth, I move on without finishing points and brake up previously started trends into inconsistent dribble.   

They, the writers, would say that I need to clean up my act and think about the reader.  I need to tell you what I am going to tell you, tell you that thing, then tell you what I told you -- If I do not do this it is amateurish and my work unlettered and wanting.  If I use colloquial terms and not the more proper method of speaking,  I should be banned from having thoughts.  uhh... I don't know about all that.  Is it really that serious.  I mean perhaps, I don't think I am getting a gig as an editor from a tear sheet consisting of my blog postings --thankfully I am not applying. 

Now keep in mind that if I use those things for effect they will call me pretentious --for your writing to be praised it must be on a 7th grade level and simple and follow the rules of society, the government, religion and another subjective measure "they" so choose --really want to know who "they" is, "they" do quite a bit and make lots of decisions, apparently.  

Now look at where we are people.  Lots of ignorant sheeple have been doing what they are told, taking the classes, following the rules, paying the bills: All fucked!  All of them, completely fucked.  No healthcare, no retirement, no general piece of mind.  Meanwhile we are all fighting for a seat at the front of the titanic.  More and more evident each day, week, month.  But if I would just get on the fucking bandwagon, I too could be successful --what a croc of shit.  Where we have really been successful is in creating rules just to break them; pushing against convention, not following it. 

Now I, obviously, think I am hilarious.  I am falling over laughing right now.  And, even when I do get things wrong, "you know what the fuck I am saying", "I said what I said"; might be the best way to understand my feelings here, you get the gist.  And, might I mention, I have been writing this shit for more than a decade and I might have 1k visitors per month -- if I wanted to pay for it perhaps more, but paying for advertising has never been my jam, always though things would just work out and there would be organic traffic, there hasn't been.  Are people going to start thinking more.  I think the beatings are planned to continue until moral improves is more what is going on here. Really, I am being tasked with doing more that people will not appreciate and will have no historical significants under the promise that I am wrong and just don't have the proper agency or vision to see the plan unfolding. 

If I was one of the cool kids I would have a Substack, which I do, I just have never committed to it or adding content --not really my jam, again for numerous reasons.  Primarily because I don't like the majority of the community that is popular there -- but I might be full of shit as it has been quite a while, years, since I looked or did more than read the odd article from someone posted on X or some such. 

But really, fuck modern journalism in all its forms, I am really done with how things have progressed.  You cannot, to the best of my knowledge, get reliable information without great effort --not that it has ever been any different, but perhaps we thought it was, just now it seems to be amplified by all the various connection and networks.  While you would think that opinions would become more diverse, it seems more as though information has become siloed and groups more insular and technology less inclusive and access more gated than ever. 

Look, I would like to take on this bright and shiny view of the world, but we are more like OZ than some construct more ideal.  People are full of shit and while I could do great work here, it would not put butts in the seats, in my estimation --as I have done this on other projects, as this is one of many.  What happens is what always happens, perhaps people look at things once in a while, but basically it is only my small circle of friends and associates that are readings this --proofed by the lack of dick-pics in the comments.  

For all those that are hoping that blogging will somehow help them reach a new personal or business plateau: boy do I have some sorry ass news for you.  Like I want right now to take the time to go grab some great sites and show you their lack of following despite great content, but you don't care, I am not doing that much work and for those that due care there are plenty of people that have written articles that you don't want to search for or pay for or read on this topic.  Not sure why it is my job to go do the work again that I have already done so you can get the answer through me through Google.  Fuck sake, who's picking up my electric bill, my day is long enough.  But you get the point.  Lots of great content --most of the small crowd reading this likely created a lot of it, but still people are looking for pussy videos on Twitter (X.com) and I am not talking about cats. 

Point being, Wikipedia exists and people could give two shits.  There is a crowd that hangs there and it's rather small, smaller than one would think.  Basically 1% of the population of high-level students at top universities.  This is not a large number, you math majors will suspect, and of those people even less want to spend time reading other peoples work that hasn't been vetted by some official mechanism, except in rare cases where the agency of the individual comes from another paradigm.  Comedy, University -- but the most listen to people are artists and actors.  Apparently being recorded on film makes you super smart on everything other than acting, unless you are shooting porn, then you're just a whore.  Whereas the real whores are mostly on Fox News, just an observation; and, for the more sensitive, I'm talking about the women. 

So I could dive in on these things and provide citations, but what the fuck is the point, you don't care, not going to read the citations, and for the crowed what I "think" is likely enough in this context.  Anyone that is not convinced I am not going to change their mind regardless of the keyboard masturbation I perform here.  So I would rather be content to just dribble on in my own way if you don't mind.  Just want to sit here and appreciate my ceiling fan, before someone comes and tries to take it.  So I am going to keep writing stuff and putting up unrelated images that you will hopefully find offensive and you just continue to take it RAW and we'll be just find.  The world will be just fine.  Remember, it's just a ride. 

Thank god we have the pastors and the government and the institutions to tell us all what to do and how to behave, how would we ever survive without them. 

 

Clubhouse to Fanbase. (Progression?)

 

Initially, the idea of blogging appealed to me. I envisioned fostering a vibrant community, engaging in meaningful discussions, and gaining valuable insights from readers. However, after a decade of writing, the reality has been quite different. Instead of thoughtful commentary, I mostly received angry emails nitpicking punctuation or phrasing. Positive interactions were rare, often limited to people I already knew offline.

To be fair, I haven't always prioritized quality over quantity. Writing is a personal hobby, not a profession. My posts are more akin to a stream of consciousness than polished prose, so mistakes and typos are inevitable. While I occasionally make corrections, it's not a priority. This blog is more akin to a personal journal than a publication like The New Yorker.

As life got busier, I turned to audio apps like Discord for community interaction. It required less effort and offered more engaging conversations, primarily with gamers and tech enthusiasts—my preferred crowd. I didn't even own a cell phone for years, so mobile-only apps held little appeal.

During the COVID-19 era, with more time on my hands and a new smartphone, I decided to try Clubhouse after hearing about its impressive network. It felt like a podcast where you could interact with intelligent and accomplished individuals.Initially, Clubhouse lived up to the hype.

But over time, the platform's user base shifted. The once-vibrant community of thought leaders and innovators became diluted with a mix of personalities, including some with harmful intentions. While good conversations and humor still existed, they became less frequent.

The app's management exacerbated the problem with constant changes to the interface, often making it worse. This,combined with the influx of new users, led many long-time users to abandon Clubhouse. I, too, drastically reduced my usage.

The downfall of Clubhouse is a cautionary tale in app development and community management. Forced changes rarely yield the desired results. Organic growth and community-driven evolution are far more effective.

Clubhouse could have been a successful platform if it hadn't alienated its core user base through constant changes and mismanagement. It serves as a reminder that even with a promising start, a platform can falter without a clear vision and respect for its community.

I've mostly moved on, although I still occasionally check in to witness the ongoing saga. It's disappointing to lose touch with people who were solely on Clubhouse, but I've found solace in Fanbase, which seems to be a promising alternative.Many insightful individuals from Clubhouse have migrated there, and the community seems more focused and less prone to toxicity.

While I continue to blog and hope for a resurgence in long-form reading, the current social media landscape favors short-form content and quick engagement. Platforms like Fanbase and Twitter, with their micro-blogging models, seem to be thriving. It will be interesting to see how Clubhouse evolves, but for now, I'm exploring other avenues for meaningful online interactions.

Elliptical History and the Place of the Historian

    The odd thing about history, or anything one learns about, is the recursiveness of it all. The more you learn, the more questions you have, the more study and dissemination required. If one is motivated enough to seek such answers in any definable, empirical and useful way; then one must dive deeply and fully in order to gain applicable intellectual agency. Combining most if not all of the forms and features of liberal arts, defining history contextually is dependent on understanding the perspective and experiences of those of the era. The experiences and decisions of the people really make the difference. The people, the human condition, human experience; that is history. Technology, doctrine and governmental structure are auxiliary elements and forces. Providing the immutable boundaries of the past, though not wholly or contextually defining it. The eras and ages will be greatly redefined, in time, to accommodate new data and evidence. That is the beauty of history: its depth and fungibility within its empirical permanence. As we learn more, experience more as a people, history is altered. We are all part of it and impacted by it, history is, essentially and literally, what we make it and how it is subsequently interpreted. This goes as much for our modern and future generations, as it did for those we see below and behind us on the timeline of human evolution. We have developed colloquialism, epics and monuments to ourselves; our societies and our achievements: with the foresight that someone, will someday be peering in from the future to the past; utilizing the last standing bits of our present from which to gauge our empirical and greater historical worth -- measuring such against the whole human history.

    So as we look back: we must be careful to remember that history was, in fact and in scripture, mindfully shaped and altered by those who lived within it; with the knowledge and intention of creating a legacy, or caring for one. This is not to say that every action and event is a carefully crafted scenario with an intent to deceive, that there doesn’t exist raw and unfettered truth in ancient text, to suggest that each element is a member of a larger class of propaganda (though clearly evident), or to otherwise persuade one that historical allegories have no empirical worth; though this is an acknowledgement that facts and truth are not all that history contains. An acknowledgement that there are indeed solipsistic virtues, values and narratives peppered throughout historical pericope. And a further acknowledgement that we must be cognizant of context and motivation, above and beyond the facts laid out on the surface; in order to gain proper and useful insight. Like making tactical decisions within the “fog of war”; we must create and rely on moral and ethical boundaries, syllogisms, and a nonsolipsistic sense of personal and cultural detachment: in order to ethically and empirically weigh past events.

    Religion is essentially a construct of social and common law. Taking the nature of man and reforming them into a subclass of human, more able to live and work toward prolific culture in close proximity. Religion, in one form or another, has been instrumental in social life. Whether it be in the Ma’at of egypt and it provincial standard from which much of their personal and municipal laws and codes (as well as other civilizations and religions) were constructed; or be it, Christianity and Islam, in the Empire of Charlemagne and the progression of trade and education which resulted: religion, of some type and structure, has been a base on which many, if not all, empires have been built. As much as it pains me personally, we must admit the great and pervasive influence of the Christian church has had, specifically with in terms of Western Culture, in its many incarnations. Religion often lead to the formation of social structure, and the retention of the same. At each point in history there is an, however unique, approach to mysticism and/or spirituality as a means of connecting the mind and hearts of the populous to the goals and social construct demanded or needed at the time; as well as being used as an explanation of the perpetually unexplainable. We could, and often do, encapsulate this as nationalism; or compartmentalize it, with other separate and more specific facets of society and belief; though, religion, and more acutely belief: is certainly a pervasive construct -- and surely is, what has been, the central uniting factor throughout many -- if not, in some abstract way, all -- of the great civilizations of the West. Without “religion” (and transference of tradition in a larger and more mechanistic sense), neither Eastern or Western, culture or society would exist.

    There must be a starting point for law and order; an authority. As such, there must be a sense of, and mechanistic agency for: authority. Hence, we have religion, in its many forms and cultural abstractions. For reasons far to various and in depth to state here, the social structure needs an authority to have a moral base (likely the same path from which Hobbes arrives at the nature of man; and Machiavelli arrived at the importance of state facilitated education, structure and social-culture (ie. nationalism)). Whether that be “God”, “Science”, Humanism or fear through tyrannical rule: people need structure and defined set of values, to live together - “peaceably”. I think we would like to believe we are nondeterministic, rational beings; though I fear that is far less the case than most will ever be willing or able to admit. People can “worship” anything. I think it less important what they “worshiped”, but that they “worship” something. Providing a moral and ethical base from which life can be based, and policy and culture argued -- and ultimately progressed. Evidenced by the sheer amount and variation in religion; which basically have the same morality -- though they may disagree in procedure and petence, tradition and observances. There is not a particularly “significant” difference in any two religions one compares; more likely is there being several collisions of thoughts, ideals and practices; which, I think, speaks far more to how alike we are as a species; independent of geographical, social, or idolic influences.

    Food, however, is what actually takes us to the next plane of enlightenment. Provides the ability to foster: religion, social identity, nationalism, science, trade, education, etc. A stable and robust food source is central to settlement (among other, similar, geographic elements). Because it is central to life, food enables us to grow both literally and intellectually. Settlement precedes trade and supplements personal energy output with the collective. Trade is crucial to growth.

    Growth facilities industry, organically mandating education and common law. Education is central to social and intellectual progression. Settlement and education facilitate creativity and a move away from mysticism and theistic spirituality, not by choice but as a reflection of need and stage of cultural-development. Leading empires to a more humanistic view, progressing cultures into more emotive and representational art, normally progressing to an assertion of further personal and social rights. In each case, total enlightenment seems close at hand, at least to the less educated or historically versed among the observing populace. Then, as if scripted; through war, disease, revolt, economic disaster, or general social progression which culminates in reform (though usually through civil war): the reset button is hit. Progressing us to the next iteration of these same events. Sliding back into a rebuilding stage, where concepts and traditions are rebuilt through the acquisition of intellectual blocks of knowledge from the past-- just as society post Rome used the literal and figurative building blocks of the empire from which to build a new. And once again the journey starts where it left off. Delivering us back to the “dark ages” from which to climb out again, refreshed and recreated; reeducated and reaffirmed in belief.

Only through hermeneutics, ethical scholarship, and ethical politic: can we be delivered from the “evil” of man, of our “human nature”. There is no positive and definitive way from which to secure our future and avoid continually repeating our past: conceptually -- or literally, in the worst case. This is as much a theme of the movie “War Games” as it is within the epic of human history. We create and we destroy, only to recreate and declare our new foundations infallible, unassailable and indestructible. We continually learn the same lessons, only for another generation to recreate the same paradigm within a different context and set of ideals; whether they be geographically separate or simply separated by time. So I rationalize this as the job of the historian: to inform the future of our past. Through careful and precise dissemination of events, proper contextualization of the present, and the effect had on the present by the ancient and recent past: informing the future of the mistakes they are currently making and those they will undoubtedly recreate. The historian does this with hindsight, foresight and with the hope that the next iteration of the world will be better, more informed, less painful, and kinder than the last.

Articles are shit.

     Many articles, particularly in business and entertainment, seem to prioritize clickbait headlines and superficial content over substance. While some publications maintain high standards, many others appear to have abandoned rigorous journalism in favor of chasing trends and appealing to the lowest common denominator.

This trend is evident in the prevalence of articles that exaggerate scientific findings, draw questionable conclusions, or focus excessively on sensational topics like Donald Trump. Meanwhile, meaningful discussions and in-depth analysis are often overlooked.

The decline in the quality of online content is not limited to professional publications. Even on personal blogs and social media, many individuals seem more interested in expressing their opinions than engaging in thoughtful discourse. This is reflected in the frequent ad hominem attacks and knee-jerk reactions that dominate many online spaces.

This phenomenon isn't new. Jonathan Franzen's essay "The Reader in Exile" explored the decline of reading and the rise of superficial entertainment. The film "Idiocracy" satirized a future where intelligence and critical thinking are devalued.These warnings, however, seem to have gone largely unheeded.

The current political climate, with the potential return of Donald Trump to power, highlights the consequences of a society that prioritizes entertainment over education and critical thinking. Many individuals lack basic scientific knowledge and seem unwilling or unable to engage in reasoned debate.

While I'm not immune to making assumptions or overlooking information, I strive to base my opinions on evidence and logical reasoning. However, I'm often dismayed by the prevalence of individuals who confidently espouse opinions on complex issues without demonstrating a basic understanding of the underlying facts.

This is not limited to any particular political group; both progressives and conservatives are susceptible to this tendency.It's disheartening to see people who can't manage their own lives confidently dictating how society should function.

It's important to be critical of information we encounter, regardless of the source. We should strive to base our opinions on evidence and be willing to revise them when presented with new information. Only then can we hope to have meaningful conversations and make informed decisions about the issues that affect us all.

Gear stuff. (if you read) \ Cameras, 2023

(Picture mostly unrelated) 

It seems that most people, other than those specifically focused on photography, are using their phone as their “Primary Camera”.  Beyond the feel, which some are currently working on solving, there is the functionality that camera’s have which phones just cannot mimic.  

Regardless of the reasoning, if you are interested in buying a camera and you are not intending on spending the equivalent to a mortgage payment, here are some of my opinions and available options you may not have considered.  Whether this is for social media or other types of production, there is a huge amount of selection that is difficult to navigate and compare —which is likely why gear videos are so popular on YouTube these days.

Everyone is looking to spend the least but still be able to produce high quality content.

——

The current prices of the Fujifilm line have gone out of control (fairly recently), where cameras that were recently $250 to $600 have skyrocketed to $600 - $2500 based on popularity and lens selection. (Particularly the Fuji X system) If you are into the camera world, you likely have seen the rise in the Fuji camera’s and other compacts with viewfinders that, in whatever myriad of ways, mimic the Leica brand or have a similar form factor. Some, like Cannon, are actually developing in their area now with full frame offerings.  If you are thinking of buying a camera right now, I would suggest waiting a bit, or if you must, buying a lower end camera that can get you buy for the moment, as camera prices are currently falling more than many in the area would like to speak about.  While this is likely do to a drop in consumer pricing, I would predict these prices will continue to fall for the foreseeable future, at least into next year.  Not to mention, used gear is very much the way to go now if you are not in the high-end professional space, and even if you are, perhaps.  

——

Now you certainly are not going to get the level of detail as a Nikon Z9 with a common 10 year old camera, even a pro-body, but based on the compression of images on social media that is likely not as big a problem as your mind may make it out to be. For those just getting started, looking to do their own advertising or video media, or hobbyists: there exist a large selection just based on how fast the industry moves and how many previous pro-models exist on the used market.

I have a few reasons why I think this is true: 

1. You are not (as previously mentioned) going to have an issue with quality, most of the cameras in the last two decades can produce good to great work, particularly when we are speaking of lower priced (older) pro-gear. 
2. You can fix everything in post:  While you may not get great results out of camera, that are perfect, with AI noise reduction, Lightroom, Photoshop and other modern editing software and techniques —that is a fairly easy fix. 
3. The older glass available, due to the rise of mirrorless, gives you a look you would likely be trying to replicate in post, out-of-camera —diverging from the more sterile look of images coming from newer cameras and sensor technology. 

I am not going to go through all the options, go to DP Review (if it still exists)  if that is what you are looking for, I am just going to speak about what I have looked at, purchased and why —you can make your decisions from that.  Now keep in mind, I am working on a production company and need more cheap functional cameras than most, but I think if you are in the market for only one, these same reasonings for use-cases will apply to you at some level as well. 

—— 

Organized from Low End - High-end (more-or-less):  I have organized these choices from price to more pro function, 

DSLR’s: 

Cannon: 

Cannon 50D — all around, tough, smaller capable camera for a small budget.  Does video and has newer features, great color replication, look and capability for the cost — roughly $60-$80 at the time of writing, with a lens for $80-$120 depending on the lens, but kit lens from this series are pretty capable. 

Cannon 550D — Good Low light but not “weather sealed”, not a pro-body. 

Cannon 7D — all around, low budget, pro-body, good low light potential for the age of the camera, sensors 1.6 cropped, but fast camera with good video potential (Avengers and others have been filmed on it).  $150-$250

Cannon 7D Mark II  — sharper all around than the 7D, fast, good auto focus, about $300-$400 at the time of writing.  $300-500

Cannon 5D — Full Frame portrait camera, slow but great images, good if you are switching from film to digital, faster relatively.  Great image quality, excellent in everyday situations, not as much in low light but useable with skill.  $150-$250

Cannon 5D Mark II  — Full Frame (More Modern), fast for the time but not fast by modern standards, great image quality, good lowlight performance for these sensors, really tough camera, pro-body and weather sealed like the other full frame cannons of this era.  $250-$300

Cannon 5D Mark III —  Basically a better Mark II, better video and low light, a bit faster, more at the range of the 7D with full frame quality and editing options.  $500-$1200. 

Nikon: 

Nikon D700 - Pro model, great in low light, fast, tough camera.  Older but still very capable.  Other than the portrait color science I would put it above the Cannon Cameras for the year, which is tougher would probably fall to the cannons, nearly, but you will still get 500,000 to 1mil shutter count on these rigs.  $250-$500 

Nikon D7100 — Great sensor for low light, fast and small form factor Nikon for a pro-model.  Not as good of lens selection as Cannon, but you shouldn’t worry about that anyway.  $200-$500  

Nikon D3 - Great camera, great sensor, low light and for speed, not huge amount of megapixel count, but doesn’t matter, great images.  Super strong,  $250-$350

Mirrorless: 

Mirrorless is still somewhat expensive, but there are some reasonable options to consider if you are looking for a capable compact.  I have had the Sony A6000 - a6400, love those cameras —and I have tried the Cannon M50, great camera.  I, personally, own the RX1R II, purchased before the prices went up, not sure if it is worth it for the average person, but it is great to travel with (but buy lots of batteries).   Lenses for the RX1R are more expensive if you do not have other Sony Cameras, perhaps better to go with one of the FujiFilm fixed lens cameras or others in the X series. 

Cannon M50 - Great camera, small form factor, expensive, great quality, a bit sterile and over sharp. 

Sony a6000 - a6600, great cameras, not weather sealed other than the a6600 (I believe) but pretty rugged for the build.  Good option for traveling and occasional use.  $250 - $600 

——

Not going to get into the micro four thirds selections, you will have to take that task on yourself, just not my world, but I will link some of those with reviews that shoot these more regularly. 

Sony
RX1R II

https://www.sony.com/za/electronics/cyber-shot-compact-cameras/dsc-rx1rm2

RX1R II Professional Compact Camera with 35mm Sensor | DSC-RX1RM2 | Sony South Africa

Lets contextualize a few things: 

1. I am only really speaking to photo people here, and perhaps people that work with occasional video —as that is less my area, you will want to look up some of those specific articles/videos that are speaking specifically to “video people”, who are certainly a different bread.  However, you will likely find at least the 5D Mark II and 50D as suitable choices for video as well. 
2. All of these are not going to give you the quality and dynamic range of “modern cameras”, but you should know that already.  What they will provide you is work equal to that of professional work 10 years ago, which I would say, looking back, holds up. 
3. Most of these prices will likely stay about the same or go down, but in the short term these bodies/lens will hold their value quite well.

----

Understanding Camera Optics and Lenses.

Lenses are like the eyes of your camera. They determine what you see and how you see it. Just like how each person has a unique perspective on the world, every lens has its own unique characteristics and strengths.

Imagine you're standing in the middle of a crowded street, and you're trying to take a picture of a building across the way. You can use a wide-angle lens to capture the entire scene, including the people and cars in the foreground. Or, you can use a telephoto lens to zoom in on the building and isolate it from the surrounding distractions. Each lens will give you a different perspective, and it's up to you to decide which one is best for the moment.

It's like choosing a pair of glasses. Do you want the glasses that let you see everything in the room, or the ones that focus on the details? It depends on what you're trying to achieve. Just like how different glasses can give you a different view of the world, different lenses can give you a different view of the scene in front of you.

But lenses aren't just about perspective. They're also about capturing light. Think of it like a chef using different ingredients to create a dish. Just like how a chef needs to balance different flavors and textures to make a dish taste just right, photographers need to balance different aspects of light to make an image look just right.

The aperture is like the seasoning in a dish. You can add more or less seasoning depending on the taste you're going for. In the same way, you can adjust the aperture to control the amount of light that enters the lens. A wide aperture lets in more light, which is great for low-light situations, but it also creates a shallow depth of field. A narrow aperture lets in less light, which is great for bright situations, but it also creates a deep depth of field.

Shutter speed is like the heat in a dish. You can increase or decrease the heat to cook the dish faster or slower. In photography, you can increase or decrease the shutter speed to capture motion or freeze it. A fast shutter speed freezes motion, while a slow shutter speed creates motion blur.

ISO is like the texture of a dish. You can make it smooth or grainy depending on the style you're going for. In photography, you can increase or decrease the ISO to adjust the sensitivity of the sensor to light. A low ISO creates a smooth image, while a high ISO creates a grainy image.

But like any great chef, you need to balance these ingredients to create the perfect dish. You can't just add a bunch of seasoning and hope for the best. You need to taste as you go and adjust as needed. In photography, you need to experiment and adjust as you go to create the perfect image.

But no matter how great the ingredients are, you need the right tools to make it all work. Just like how a chef needs the right knives and pots and pans, a photographer needs the right lenses and camera bodies. But it's not just about having the best gear. It's about knowing how to use it to its fullest potential.

So, if you want to be a great photographer, you need to think like a chef. You need to balance different ingredients to create the perfect dish. You need to experiment and adjust as you go. And most importantly, you need to have fun and enjoy the process. Because at the end of the day, photography is about capturing moments and memories that will last a lifetime.

---